Twitter Feed Popout byInfofru

No matter what your opinion of the ISS, you have to ask...

Posted by Admin

No matter what your opinion of the ISS, you have to ask...

 

The heat you are experiencing is due to the kinetic energy in the molecules of your system. This vibrational energy of your molecules is what emits Infrared EM radiation and allows people to see you with an infrared camera etc. If you were in the Exosphere for instance, you would be in direct solar radiation which would excite and vibrate the molecules in your spacecraft. Without the shielding of the Earth's magnetic field, or the atmosphere, whilst on the daylight side of the Earth you would heat up based on the surface area exposed to that radiation. Because there is no atmosphere you would only be able to radiate heat away, so you would heat up to a very high temperature until your radiation emission equalled the incoming radiation energy hitting your surface from the Sun. At night you would be very cold as nothing would stop all the energy being radiated away. This is why the ISS uses liquids pumped around to cool it at daytime and then to warm it at night. The ISS travels at 7Km/s and so the day is only roughly 90 minutes, so they don't cook.

Now this all sounds perfectly reasonable, but it doesn't explain what is happening in the videos below.


 

 

 

 

 

 

Carlos Castaneda and the Grey Alien Allies - The First Extraterrestrial Conversation?

Posted by Admin

Carlos Castaneda and the Grey Alien Allies - The First Extraterrestrial Conversation?

 

If you look into the Nagual vs Tonal part of Castaneda's work, you can clearly see he is discussing what science has come to term the left and right hand sides of the Brain. You can look at Jill Bolte Taylor's talk on YouTube at Ted to get an idea of the difference between the two worlds, but essentially one is held together by dialog and the other is rather like being a conduit for perception rather than processing or labelling.

Once you accept these two states/worlds then you can begin to accept that the allies of which Castaneda speaks (the inorganic beings) could well be the grey aliens as they are thought to be non-biological entities created by a race that may well have become extinct since, and that they emulate a human being, but because they are essentially soulless, they do not appear as a luminous egg, but as a human form, even in the world of the Nagual, or unrestricted non-verbalised world of the other half of the brain.

 

M=e/c^2 the Inverse Square Law of Light

Posted by Admin

M=e/c^2 the Inverse Square Law of Light

 

Spin is important. Spin is what creates mass, or the appearance of an object holding mass. When electromagnetic radiation is spinning in a certain way it creates a mass that can be detected through inertia, because the spinning of the EMR holds true to the same tendency as a gyroscope, it resists changes in its orientation, and as the EMR is spinning in many different axis of the impossibly small sphere in which it exists, it resists every change in momentum giving inertia.

Conversely, when EMR is travelling in a straight line, it appears to have no detectable mass, because it no longer has any spin, and therefore no resistance to changes in momentum or direction, such as when it is reflected by a mirror. This is why m=e/c^2 holds, because the energy being released is EMR travelling outwards obeying the inverse square law as it fills the area of the sphere from the radius distance from where it was released/had it spin disturbed.

The spinning of planet Earth is what gives the mass of each particle the appearance of attracting other matter by gravity. The spinning of the mass of the Earth creates a gravitational field just as a gyroscope does. It is encapsulated in its own gravitational field and invulnerable to other gravitational fields around it.

Every photon is a discrete energy packet of light but does it have a property that can be assimilated with this? Matter waves depict the interactions that indicate wave behaviour in light, just as they do in water, but if light can only travel at the constant c then how could it not be travelling in a straight line? As well as this the derivation of E=mc^2 depends on F=ma holding valid, which when considering light, really has no relevance whatsoever. There is no m, no a and no F. So what is really going on?

Photons are their own antiparticle according to latest quantum lore, which essentially means that light or EMR can account for wave-like behaviour without requiring interaction with any other phenomenon. 

Comets and the Electric Universe from Richplanet.net

Posted by Admin

Comets and the Electric Universe from Richplanet.net

 

What do you actually know about where the Earth is in the Universe and what should the attitude of the public be to space? It is something that virtually none of us have ever seen or ever interacted with, and yet it is where our planet sits, isn't it?

What should we be aware of and what are we told that may not be accurate? The science that is taken for granted on mainstream media may not be as correct as you might imagine, and there may be reasons for the inaccuracies that might surprise you.

Richard Hall and Andrew Johnson take us through an excellent explanation of our solar system and what has been discovered that does not seem to fit in with the view we are being sold.

The law of energy conservation twinned with Einstein's Relativity leave us with two rather depressing concepts:

Energy will always cost you money

You will never travel to another solar system

Is this the truth? Is Relativity as accurate picture as all that and is it possible that the universe is actually a lot simpler in nature than we've been led to believe. Relativity, although mind boggling in it's genius, is also mind boggling in it's ability to slow progress in any given field of research. There is no question that since 1916 the minds of scientists seem to be preoccupied with conceiving the idea of Relativity rather than achieving anything with it. Is it possible that the gravitational ideas put forward by Einstein cloud by intention? What are the other possibilities concerning the creation of the Universe? The Big Bang is a theory very thinly based on simple background radiation levels and a lot of assumption. Is the key to free energy right in front of us? 

What are comets made of? If it is not ice, as NASA's probes seem to indicate then why do they stick to a theory that has no basis in discovery? If it conflicts with evidence or experiment then shouldn't it be discarded? Why does modern science seem to stick to these ideas no matter what is uncovered? Is the modern scientific world too set in it's ways and too afraid of disgrace? Is it being manipulated by other forces? Who really decides what goes on the front page of New Scientist anymore?

 

Part 1

 

Part 2

 

Part 3

Sensible Ideas About Space Travel

Posted by Admin

Sensible Ideas About Space Travel

Richard D. Hall's talk on deception in space travel.

Richard really does give a great talk here, imparting a well thought out and considered opinion of modern space travel deception. The point he makes about reliability of moon missions throughout the 50s, 60s and 70s is vitally important to aid understanding of NASA's management bedlam during the 60s. They had been set an impossible task by a man who had been murdered in the public eye. A man who had been elevated in standing to an almost immortal plane, as the murderers wanted the public to focus on what he said, rather than who killed him and why.

I would add to Richard's talk, that the possible faking of the moon landings only aids the true rulers' agendas, as it takes up so much time for researchers everywhere, rather than them focusing on the alien agenda and the black world military space capabilities.

Richard goes on to discuss the current debacle of a space programme, and all of the attention diverter that it currently supports. Elon Musk is shown to be aware, clearly, of more advanced technologies than his ancient rockets and their guidance systems (OK the guidance systems are pretty impressive.)

Richard also discusses Mars and the incredible discoveries that have been made, and subsequently hidden from the public. The various Cydonia Pyramids and Face as well as the Scale Reproduction of Avebury on Mars are all incredible discoveries that give real evidence and possibly even a complete explanation of the origins of life on Earth, or at least human life. The evidence given in motion pictures such as Mission to Mars and Total Recall is a tantalizing glimpse of the truth to be discovered in these incredible structures. Richard's reasoning as to why they are faking the Mars Rovers is compelling and intelligently defined and I advise anyone interested in their own freedom to listen with an open mind.

Also under examination is the roadblock in place to stop anyone looking into electrogravitics and antigravity systems. The General Relativity theory that has expressed Gravity as deformed spacetime due to mass is an amazing theory, but it does ignore the obvious connections between electromagnet forces, diamagnetics and gravity.

AI Artificial Intelligence is also discussed, and the fear-mongering expressed by Musk and Hawking, which is essentially a pathway towards the end of human enslavement, currently imposed upon us by the Rothschilds and their associates - I can't imagine they gave any friends.

One more point to make is that this talk is made as part of Richard's Richplanet tours, tickets for which can be obtained at richplanet.net when they are upcoming.

You have to commend the NASA astronauts that landed on the Moon

Posted by Admin

You have to commend the NASA astronauts that landed on the Moon

 

These computer modelled, computer controlled, heavily researched rocket landing systems failed missing only one thing from NASA Moon Landings; they didn't have a human being at the controls to keep her steady.

Good Advice on the Space Programme Dilemma

Posted by Admin

Good Advice on the Space Programme Dilemma

 

My advice is to pay some attention to Mr. Hall in regard of the space programme question.

Whether you are an advocate of NASA and ESA or if you do think it is important to question, this is a good piece of advice on the space programme.

Although there does seem to be a giant German hovering about behind STS-8 whilst deploying a satellite, Richard's opinions on the validity of Space exploration do resonate, as his sobriety and courage as an investigator shine through. Although there are definitely potential reasons to question ISS (question rather than just doubt) he makes a good point that the ISS is verifiable in terms of observable objects in space and that if the footage is in anyway faked (or made to tempt us believe that it is faked) then there are still may reasons to believe that most of the space exploration we see is real.

RichPlanet Space: The Final Frontier