No matter what your opinion of the ISS, you have to ask...
The heat you are experiencing is due to the kinetic energy in the molecules of your system. This vibrational energy of your molecules is what emits Infrared EM radiation and allows people to see you with an infrared camera etc. If you were in the Exosphere for instance, you would be in direct solar radiation which would excite and vibrate the molecules in your spacecraft. Without the shielding of the Earth's magnetic field, or the atmosphere, whilst on the daylight side of the Earth you would heat up based on the surface area exposed to that radiation. Because there is no atmosphere you would only be able to radiate heat away, so you would heat up to a very high temperature until your radiation emission equalled the incoming radiation energy hitting your surface from the Sun. At night you would be very cold as nothing would stop all the energy being radiated away. This is why the ISS uses liquids pumped around to cool it at daytime and then to warm it at night. The ISS travels at 7Km/s and so the day is only roughly 90 minutes, so they don't cook.
Now this all sounds perfectly reasonable, but it doesn't explain what is happening in the videos below.
Atlantis - The Eye Of Africa
Atlantis is the ultimate myth, isn't it?
Well let us go back to where the myth originates and see how trustworthy the source is, and why it is generally considered to be a fairy tale today by the mainstream scholars.
Plato is actually the source of the Atlantis story. His ancestor, Solon, six generations his elder, went to Egypt in order to accumulate knowledge. He wrote of many stories he came across in scripture, engraving and by word of mouth. Among these stories were the historical kings of Egypt that appeared to go back further than recorded history as it has been known (up until the likes of Graham Hancock and friends, anyway.) as well as stories of great powers and civilizations that had existed before the last two ice ages. One of these civilizations was known as Atlantis, which if nothing else gave us the name of one of the great oceans of planet Earth (Atlantic - sea of Atlantis) but also told of a highly developed and militarily powerful nation that was destroyed in the period eleven thousand six hundred years ago, which actually is the time when a huge meteorite hit southern Greenland and raised the ocean levels by about 150 metres to around that of the sea level today. He also describes the surrounding in terms of mountains and the layout of the islands and their equivalent and total sizes. This is all a little too much evidence to be prematurely discounting the Richat structure as being a possible contender as the site of the City of Atlantis.
Carlos Castaneda and the Grey Alien Allies - The First Extraterrestrial Conversation?
If you look into the Nagual vs Tonal part of Castaneda's work, you can clearly see he is discussing what science has come to term the left and right hand sides of the Brain. You can look at Jill Bolte Taylor's talk on YouTube at Ted to get an idea of the difference between the two worlds, but essentially one is held together by dialog and the other is rather like being a conduit for perception rather than processing or labelling.
Once you accept these two states/worlds then you can begin to accept that the allies of which Castaneda speaks (the inorganic beings) could well be the grey aliens as they are thought to be non-biological entities created by a race that may well have become extinct since, and that they emulate a human being, but because they are essentially soulless, they do not appear as a luminous egg, but as a human form, even in the world of the Nagual, or unrestricted non-verbalised world of the other half of the brain.
M=e/c^2 the Inverse Square Law of Light
Spin is important. Spin is what creates mass, or the appearance of an object holding mass. When electromagnetic radiation is spinning in a certain way it creates a mass that can be detected through inertia, because the spinning of the EMR holds true to the same tendency as a gyroscope, it resists changes in its orientation, and as the EMR is spinning in many different axis of the impossibly small sphere in which it exists, it resists every change in momentum giving inertia.
Conversely, when EMR is travelling in a straight line, it appears to have no detectable mass, because it no longer has any spin, and therefore no resistance to changes in momentum or direction, such as when it is reflected by a mirror. This is why m=e/c^2 holds, because the energy being released is EMR travelling outwards obeying the inverse square law as it fills the area of the sphere from the radius distance from where it was released/had it spin disturbed.
The spinning of planet Earth is what gives the mass of each particle the appearance of attracting other matter by gravity. The spinning of the mass of the Earth creates a gravitational field just as a gyroscope does. It is encapsulated in its own gravitational field and invulnerable to other gravitational fields around it.
Every photon is a discrete energy packet of light but does it have a property that can be assimilated with this? Matter waves depict the interactions that indicate wave behaviour in light, just as they do in water, but if light can only travel at the constant c then how could it not be travelling in a straight line? As well as this the derivation of E=mc^2 depends on F=ma holding valid, which when considering light, really has no relevance whatsoever. There is no m, no a and no F. So what is really going on?
Photons are their own antiparticle according to latest quantum lore, which essentially means that light or EMR can account for wave-like behaviour without requiring interaction with any other phenomenon.
Neil Sanders Mind Control
Mind control is a never ending part of our daily lives and we need to be aware of it. Has it ever occurred to you why you feel so much more relaxed when you go to a place like Thailand or a remote island? The simple truth is that there is a huge drain upon you every day in the 'civilized' world because you are being controlled and manipulated at ever point of your lives.
Television and the media, sport, celebrity, radio are all following an agenda and that agenda is to depress, cause anxiety and create fear.
Neil Sanders is a man with his head inside the heads of those inside yours.
Check out neilsandersmindcontrol.com and find out about the bizarre terrifying world you live in, and who shares it with you.
Comets and the Electric Universe from Richplanet.net
What do you actually know about where the Earth is in the Universe and what should the attitude of the public be to space? It is something that virtually none of us have ever seen or ever interacted with, and yet it is where our planet sits, isn't it?
What should we be aware of and what are we told that may not be accurate? The science that is taken for granted on mainstream media may not be as correct as you might imagine, and there may be reasons for the inaccuracies that might surprise you.
Richard Hall and Andrew Johnson take us through an excellent explanation of our solar system and what has been discovered that does not seem to fit in with the view we are being sold.
The law of energy conservation twinned with Einstein's Relativity leave us with two rather depressing concepts:
Energy will always cost you money
You will never travel to another solar system
Is this the truth? Is Relativity as accurate picture as all that and is it possible that the universe is actually a lot simpler in nature than we've been led to believe. Relativity, although mind boggling in it's genius, is also mind boggling in it's ability to slow progress in any given field of research. There is no question that since 1916 the minds of scientists seem to be preoccupied with conceiving the idea of Relativity rather than achieving anything with it. Is it possible that the gravitational ideas put forward by Einstein cloud by intention? What are the other possibilities concerning the creation of the Universe? The Big Bang is a theory very thinly based on simple background radiation levels and a lot of assumption. Is the key to free energy right in front of us?
What are comets made of? If it is not ice, as NASA's probes seem to indicate then why do they stick to a theory that has no basis in discovery? If it conflicts with evidence or experiment then shouldn't it be discarded? Why does modern science seem to stick to these ideas no matter what is uncovered? Is the modern scientific world too set in it's ways and too afraid of disgrace? Is it being manipulated by other forces? Who really decides what goes on the front page of New Scientist anymore?
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
More Like a Dairylea Triangle
It is very important to describe any sighting of a UFO accurately, and here are a couple of gentlemen who have a fixation on small snack items trying to do just that...
Plastic Pyrolysis - Turning Plastic into Diesel
A very simple process of heating plastic to four-hundred degrees in an environment devoid of oxygen allows the process of pyrolysis to Convert plastic bags into diesel and take great steps to reduce landfill and sea pollution.